young romans

A one-act play.

“Two former Film School classmates – one successful, one a dropout – confront their presumed demons during a lunch reunion.”

THE SCENE
The street-side patio of a trendy restaurant, sometime in early-Summer. Present Day.

THE CAST
Dave, mid-to-late-30s, registered with the Film Union and good-to-go.
Ben, mid-to-late-30s, an unregistered freelancer.
A waiter, 18-20, just trying to do their job.
A proper man, 60s, who “should know what he’s talking about”.
His wife, 60s, who “should know her place better”.

*

LIGHTS UP. DAVE is waiting at a small, round table with three chairs. He’s dressed business-casual, playing with his phone. There are busy sounds around him: traffic; pedestrians – the city.

DAVE
Where the fuck is he…

A WAITER enters stage-left and approaches him.

WAITER
Have you had a chance to look at our menu yet, Sir?

DAVE
(callously)
That’s what I’m doing right now.

WAITER
Anything peak your interest?

DAVE
I don’t know, I’m not even at the appetizers yet! I’m still flipping through your sixteen-thousand pages of drinks!

WAITER
I’m sorry, Sir.

DAVE
Stupid question!

WAITER
We are well known for our selection of beer and spirits, Sir. If you’ll permit me, I could recommend something…

DAVE
No. Just go away until my guest arrives.

The waiter exits the same way he came in. From stage-right, in bursts BEN, dressed aloha-shirt casual. Dave is happy to see him, and they embrace platonically. Ben is despondent: hunched over, with closed-off body language.

DAVE
(cont’d) Wow! There’s the Big Guy!

Continue reading

Jay’s Take: The Broken Hearts Gallery

A spoiler-heavy movie review.

brokenheartsposter1

Yes, your boy Jay went to see a chick movie. There is no way around it: “The Broken Hearts Gallery” is for girls, through-and-through. And it was the only other major new release playing that my wife wanted to see for her birthday, that wasn’t subtitled (or I’d be all-over “Train to Busan 2”). But I was able to get through it like a champ. Allow me to explain: before the film, there was a trailer for “Ammonite”, which looks like the latest period-drama about an older, professional woman falling in lesbian with her much-younger assistant. It has Kate Winslet – who is fantastic – and Saoirse Ronan – who is mouth-gapingly pretty – so obviously it looked like something I would watch. My problem was that, hasn’t that particular film been done a few times now? It did seem awfully familiar. So it wouldn’t be in my best interest to assume (lest I be disappointed) that A: there would be steamy reel-to-reel sex, because there wouldn’t be, and B: that it would follow any kind of original plot or story-progression. There will obviously be some persecution; maybe the younger woman initially rejects the older woman’s advances; and the affair will probably ruin their lives, whether that means a lynching or a sad, lonely death at home like queer Alan Turing in “The Imitation Game”. Maybe the younger will leave the older for a man? Who knows. The point is, we’ve reached a precipice in cinema, where it doesn’t matter what you write, because it’s all been written before, either in books or on film, in English or any other language. So then it was all about how it looks; what directorial decisions are made; aesthetic choices that stand separate from whatever the writer originally intended behind their words.

Continue reading

katherine with a k

A micro-story.


What time is it? Did you even set the alarm? Why do I have to wake up so early? Why can’t I wake up earlier than this instead of rolling around for an hour? Why can’t my shifts start when I’m actually awake? Why can’t I turn off my alarm? Why won’t it shut up? Why won’t my husband get up when I do? Why doesn’t he get my coffee ready like he used to? What’s wrong with me? Why do I stay with him? Wouldn’t I be happier alone? Or living with my daughter and her babies? Why can’t I take the initiative and retire? Why won’t this fucking coffee maker work properly? Did I put the water in the right place? Is it plugged in? Why does it smell like something is burning? Should I look under the lid? Why is there smoke? Why did I set it and not add water first? Why am I blaming myself? Why isn’t it his problem? Why is he so stupid? Why does this needle hurt so much? Why is my blood sugar so high? How much stress can one woman take?

Continue reading

Now Available on Laserdisc: Arthur 2

IMG_20200206_110843

Full confession: I have not seen the original 1981 “Arthur”. “OH MY GOD, a movie Jason HASN’T SEEN?” Wait wait wait. I have seen the 2011 remake with Russell Brand and from what I can surmise the two movies follow the same formula: a belligerent and wealthy playboy has to learn to live without money if he wants to marry the woman of his dreams. The 2011 film oozed sentimentality and I think that had more to do with Brand’s personal struggles at the time (and his subsequent Producer credit on the remake) then it did a changing of the times: it doesn’t matter how much money either Arthur has, because eventually you will run out of things to do with it. No amount of modernization can change this, and sadly makes Arthur’s rich boy antics irrelevant; especially when there have been so many movies since about the 1% acting like idiots (The Hangover series; Blank Check; Wall Street 2; Fracture, to name a few). But where Brand’s characterization had a pathos when confronted with responsibility, Dudley Moore’s original really is only concerned with having a good time. The guy is a fucking useless drunk, and he’s an asshole! There could very well be more lurking beneath the surface of his interpretation, but Arthur 2 never gives us a chance to learn more about him: why he’s a drunk; how he feels about getting older and still not taking control of his life; his lack of confidence at middle age. Answering these wouldn’t make for a very funny movie, though (and there’s a good chance they were answered in the first one and I simply don’t know what I’m talking about. I have the sequel, not the original. I have to work with what I’ve got here).

Continue reading